Response to discussion of “Seismic damage analysis due to near-fault multipulse ground motion”

verfasst von: Guan Chen, Jiashu Yang, Ruohan Wang, Kaiqi Li, Yong Liu, Michael Beer
Abstract: The authors thank the discusser for the attention and interests on our previous work, entitled “Seismic damage analysis due to near-fault multipulse ground motion” (referred to as the original paper/work in the following text). To demonstrate the increased seismic demands required by multipulse ground motions compared to non- and single-pulse ground motions, three cases were illustrated in the original work, including frame structures, a soil slope and a concrete dam. The discusser, Dr M.Amin Hariri-Ardebili, raised concerns on the seismic response of the dam, together with the optimal intensity measure of ground motions. Specifically, four subissues are involved, including effectiveness of the numerical model of dam, the damage index for dam, the selection strategy for input ground motions, and the ground motion intensity measures. Detailed responses to these issues are provided. In short, the main conclusion in the original paper that the multipulse ground motions potentially cause more severe damage compared to non- and single-pulse ground motions is reliable.
Organisationseinheit(en): Institut für Risiko und Zuverlässigkeit
Externe Organisation(en): Wuhan University
Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
The University of Liverpool
Tongji University
Typ: Artikel
Journal: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics
Band: 53
Seiten: 861-866
Anzahl der Seiten: 6
ISSN: 0098-8847
Publikationsdatum: 09.01.2024
Publikationsstatus: Veröffentlicht
Peer-reviewed: Ja
ASJC Scopus Sachgebiete: Tief- und Ingenieurbau, Geotechnik und Ingenieurgeologie, Erdkunde und Planetologie (sonstige)
Elektronische Version(en): https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4046 (Zugang: Geschlossen)

BibTeX

@article{8cc0b6841bee4403b4b16c96dfeb29e8,
title = "Response to discussion of “Seismic damage analysis due to near-fault multipulse ground motion”",
abstract = "The authors thank the discusser for the attention and interests on our previous work, entitled “Seismic damage analysis due to near-fault multipulse ground motion” (referred to as the original paper/work in the following text). To demonstrate the increased seismic demands required by multipulse ground motions compared to non- and single-pulse ground motions, three cases were illustrated in the original work, including frame structures, a soil slope and a concrete dam. The discusser, Dr M.Amin Hariri-Ardebili, raised concerns on the seismic response of the dam, together with the optimal intensity measure of ground motions. Specifically, four subissues are involved, including effectiveness of the numerical model of dam, the damage index for dam, the selection strategy for input ground motions, and the ground motion intensity measures. Detailed responses to these issues are provided. In short, the main conclusion in the original paper that the multipulse ground motions potentially cause more severe damage compared to non- and single-pulse ground motions is reliable.",
keywords = "multipulse ground motion, near-fault earthquake, pulse-like ground motion, response spectrum, seismic damage analysis, seismic risk",
author = "Guan Chen and Jiashu Yang and Ruohan Wang and Kaiqi Li and Yong Liu and Michael Beer",
note = "Funding Information: The authors have nothing to report. ",
year = "2024",
month = jan,
day = "9",
doi = "10.1002/eqe.4046",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "861--866",
journal = "Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics",
issn = "0098-8847",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",
}